Bonky Blows Top On Nocturnal Frequency Blog

Speak of the Devil!

Sean attempted to hijack another blog, this time Nocturnal Frequency Radio's blog. The internet paranormal radio show invited David Farrant, not once, but twice to do an interview.

Of course, the Bishop of the Church of Net Curtains wouldn't stand for it as David proved to be quite popular. And so, as so many times, Bonky ranted, raved and stamped his feet in outrage - under an alias of Arminius Vámbéry. The admins have since deleted the thread as they lost patience with Sean. Thanks to the archive at Google, here is the whole tirade:

Arminius Vámbéry

6/2/2009 9:13 AM

I doubt anyone could meet a more disingenuous and deceitful person; so utterly void of sincerity; so totally consumed by his hatred for Seán Manchester. From Farrant's lips spills a poisonous brew of malice and falsehood with each and every utterance. Why anyone would take any notice of this non-entity who will do just about anything to seek attention is baffling. Far worse, he will defame and damage those he envies and fears in the pursuit of his malicious agenda.

Arminius Vámbéry

6/2/2009 11:37 AM

Like the previous interview in April, David Farrant reads at length from Seán Manchester's bestselling book THE HIGHGATE VAMPIRE, but nothing from his own self-published pamphlet. He also repeats the same defamatory allegations about an 8mm film which was never made by Seán Manchester who wants absolutely nothing to do with this convicted felon. The reason Farrant is so disliked is not because he doesn't believe Seán Manchester's account, but because of his malicious vendetta.

NOCTURNAL FREQUENCY

6/3/2009 2:56 PM

Pathetic is you spending way too much time trying to defame someone who has nothing to hide and has been completely open about this situation. Pathetic is the amount of time you must spend on the computer stocking David's every move.....

David Farrant

6/3/2009 3:27 PM

What IS pathetic Sean, are your desperate attempts to try and pretend that 'Arminious Vambery is not really yourself. You are really the coward here, Sean, hiding behind an alias to tell lies about myself. And lets make no mistake, Sean, everybody knows that this fictitious character is really yourself. You are quite incapable of telling the truth; in fact, you don't even know what the word means. You are a compulsive liar, Sean, and note, I am saying this to your face directly and signing my

Arminius Vámbéry

6/3/2009 3:46 PM

Farrant is a vile and depraved character who puts people's private addresses on both the internet and in his self-published pamphlets together with incitements of extreme hatred. People he dislikes are subject to gross defamation. Anyone who actually checks out what he says will discover he is distorting the facts and lying. He is such a coward. He refuses to meet Seán Manchester face to face in private. The only reason he uses his own name is because he desperately craves publicity.

Arminius Vámbéry

6/3/2009 3:49 PM

I am not Seán Manchester. I am my own person and know a great deal more about these matters than Steve Genier who has become Farrant's mouthpiece. Farrant is a fraud and Genier is his patsy. Genier has no idea what Farrant does to those he dislikes. And he needs no help in blackening his own name. He manages to do that every time he opens his twisted mouth out of which pours a poisonous brew of malice, misrepresentation and unsubstantiated allegations.

NOCTURNAL FREQUENCY

6/3/2009 4:09 PM

As you say Arminius..I'm my own person and no one patsy. As for mouthpieces..I think you take the award for that! It seems if you aren't Sean Manchester, then it is you who his his mouthpiece and patsy!

David Farrant

6/3/2009 4:32 PM

You ARE Sean Manchester, Sean - and everybody knows it! Everybody also knows that your 'vampire' accounts are just pure fiction and everybody knows that as well! DAVID FARRANT

Arminius Vámbéry

6/3/2009 4:49 PM

Let's cut through the smokescreen of saying I'm Seán Manchester. He accuses everyone who challenges him of being Seán Manchester. Forget that little game and let's play for higher stakes. Farrant has recently threatened to descend on Seán Manchester's private residence on the latter's birthday in a few weeks' time. He made the same threat five years ago, but failed to carry it out. Why doesn't this twisted non-entity actually turn up as promised?

Arminius Vámbéry

6/3/2009 4:54 PM

Why doesn't David Farrant have the guts to face Seán Manchester in private? They haven't been in communication for decades. Why not sort everything out once and for all? Or is hiding behind a computer posting libel and threats all Farrant can manage? His comments where he talks of turning up uninvited at Seán Manchester's private residence can be found in posts made on 14/15 May 2009 at: http://davidfarrant.org/TheHumanTouch/?p=389#comments

David Farrant

6/3/2009 6:06 PM

I have invited you to come and knock on my door. I have an injured foot and don't have a car, Sean Your wife does. Get her to drive you up from Bournemouth; you know where I live. Well? Come on you gutless fake, you know where I live. All you're really capable of Sean is hiding behind fake aliases ('Arminious' in this instance) and telling cowardly lies about people whilst pretending to be a 'bishop'. You are a sick little man Sean. David Farrant.

David Farrant

6/3/2009 6:09 PM

PS You can take that as a public invitation, Sean. David Farrant

David Farrant

6/3/2009 6:33 PM

I see you have deleted my last post Sean,where I publicly invited you to get your wife to drive you up from Bournemouth and come and knock on my door. I made the invitation publicly - which is why you deleted it. This has been copied and will keep being posted until I get a public answer, Sean. Don't hide behind your fake alias of 'Arminius'. Answer me under your real name Sean. Well? DAVID FARRANT

Arminius Vámbéry

6/4/2009 7:49 AM

I am not Seán Manchester, but I am aware of the situation better than most. The fact is that David Farrant threatened to descend on a private residence owned by Seán Manchester and he threatened to do so on Seán Manchester's birthday. Seán Manchester did not threaten to arrive on Farrant's doorstep in Muswell Hill, London. The onus is therefore on Farrant to carry out his threat which he made in posts found at: http://davidfarrant.org/TheHumanTouch/?p=389#comments

Arminius Vámbéry

6/4/2009 7:55 AM

Many have observed that if you extract Seán Manchester from any interview Farrant gives he is left with nothing to say; if you extract Seán Manchester from anything Farrant has self-published he is left with nothing to write about; and if you extract Seán Manchester from Farrant's life he becomes a poorly educated non-entity without any skills who nobody would notice. It is only by exploiting and riding on the coat-tails of Seán Manchester that Farrant has any public life.

David Farrant

6/4/2009 1:52 PM

As you’ve deleted my last post Sean, here it is again: CONTINUED: Remember, it was yourself who invited me to your bunglow in Bournemouth in 1998 to be “exorcised” (as reported by the Press then). I am merely returning the invitation now! You say . . . “Without me (you) my life would be nothing!”. Ye gods! Just reverse that and you will get the truth! David (Farrant)

David Farrant

6/4/2009 12:34 PM

Hello again Sean – sorry I mean ‘Arminious’. Still pretending not to be yourself I see. Rather like the time you pretended to be ‘dead’ after one of our duels in 1978 and I was visited by the police to ask where you were buried in Northern France! You remember surely, you did a radio interview on LBC and I said to you . . . “But you’re supposed to be dead!”. You said . . . “Don’t worry, nobody will know that its me”! Times change little don’t they Sean! Remember, it was yourself who invite...

Arminius Vámbéry

6/4/2009 3:39 PM

All Farrant can do is copy what I or someone else supportive of Seán Manchester writes. Is he obsessed with Seán Manchester or isn't he? I've lost count of all the people he has accused of being Seán Manchester who has never lived in a bungalow in his life. This is just more Farrant falsehood. To confront the man himself couldn't be easier. All he need do is carry out his threat - but Farrant is only fond of making public threats - not carrying them out. It's all about publicity.

Arminius Vámbéry

6/5/2009 7:35 AM

Farrant wouldn't recognise the truth if he walked into it with both eyes open. He can't see that most people who follow this dreary saga are well aware of his black propaganda tactics and are thoroughly bored by his smokescreen of diverting attention away from any issue or topic by alleging the other person is Seán Manchester. If Farrant is so obsessed with Seán Manchester he should face him in person. But that is something requiring more courage than Farrant could ever muster.

David Farrant

6/4/2009 4:30 PM

The only people I have accused of being yourself, Sean, have all been yourself using your various aliases., just as you’re doing now with “Arminious”. I have made no threats to you Sean, public or otherwise. I just said if you wanted to speak to me face to face(as you said) just come and knock on my door. That’s all! Where’s the threat in that??? Please enlighten me. David Farrant

Arminius Vámbéry

6/4/2009 4:17 PM

David Farrant is a non-entity who will do absolutely anything to see his name in print. This life-long social security scrounger, who has done nothing throughout his existence except engage in mindless feuds and pretend to be something he is not will defame those he envies and fears in pursuit of what can only be described as meaningless self-publicity. Never has the phrase "GET A LIFE" been more apposite than when applied to this sad, pathetic creature.

Arminius Vámbéry

6/5/2009 7:43 AM

David Farrant said he was would pay Seán Manchester a visit by posting the following on his blog (May 14th, 2009 at 7:54 pm): "Speedqueen suggested knocking on the person’s door and giving his the MMM book for his birthday ... There were other people here as well who really thought this was a good idea and offered to drive us down there ... Might go actually. Could do with a day by the sea. David" http://davidfarrant.org/TheHumanTouch/?p=389#comments

NOCTURNAL FREQUENCY

6/5/2009 10:10 AM

David, I wouldn't bother with this parrot, he's not worth the crackers you feeding him. He is only posting these false accusations to get a raise out of you. I think from the amount of feedback I've gotten through email, they certainly don't believe the bogus bishop's claims anyhow! Arminius, it's time for you to go play in that sandbox already! Maybe you'll find that friend you've always wanted! ;)

Arminius Vámbéry

6/5/2009 10:42 AM

Who is making false accusations? All anyone has to do is go to the link I provided on Farrant's blog to see there is nothing false in what I have alleged. What Steve Genier and David Farrant don't seem to understand is that they just can't publicly say whatever they like about someone, maligning them and spreading libel, and get away with it. Why are either surprised that there is a response to their anti-Manchester rants on blogtalk radio? They have created the problem.

David Farrant

6/5/2009 4:01 PM

‘Parrot’ is an excellent word. They can only repeat words out of context having no idea of their original meanings. And ‘no’. I have not got a bias against parrots! I kept several in the late 1960’s which I mentioned in Vol 1 of my autobiography. I never managed to get any to talk though! David

Arminius Vámbéry

6/6/2009 7:35 AM

Yet all these distractions do not hide the fact that Farrant cannot point to one example of where Seán Manchester has been interviewed on radio and has mentioned or even alluded to David Farrant. Indeed, why would he want or need to? Seán Manchester spoke for hours on Art Bell, George Noory and dozens of other radio programmes without once referring to Farrant. Meanwhile, Farrant cannot get through a single interview without constantly referring to Seán Manchester and his book.

David Farrant

6/6/2009 2:55 PM

You mention me the whole time, Sean, just as you are doing now. That’s the whole point! David Farrant

After that exchange, there was a request to delete the argument. Of course, the hosts were not fooled by Arminius Vámbéry. LOL! What is it with that old man and accent marks?